Wed, 14 May 2014 15:41:28 -0600
8034223: Most-specific should not have any special treatment for boxed vs. unboxed types
Summary: Rewrite most-specific logic to conform to JLS 8 15.12.2.5
Reviewed-by: vromero
1 MethodReference37.java:24:38: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.invalid.mref: kindname.constructor, (compiler.misc.cant.apply.symbol: kindname.constructor, Inner, compiler.misc.no.args, MethodReference37.Outer, kindname.class, MethodReference37.Outer.Inner, (compiler.misc.arg.length.mismatch)))
2 MethodReference37.java:29:39: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.invalid.mref: kindname.constructor, (compiler.misc.cant.apply.symbol: kindname.constructor, Inner, compiler.misc.no.args, MethodReference37.Outer, kindname.class, MethodReference37.Outer.Inner, (compiler.misc.arg.length.mismatch)))
3 MethodReference37.java:34:40: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.invalid.mref: kindname.constructor, (compiler.misc.cant.apply.symbol: kindname.constructor, Inner, compiler.misc.no.args, MethodReference37.Outer, kindname.class, MethodReference37.Outer.Inner, (compiler.misc.arg.length.mismatch)))
4 MethodReference37.java:38:41: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.invalid.mref: kindname.constructor, (compiler.misc.cant.apply.symbol: kindname.constructor, Inner, compiler.misc.no.args, MethodReference37.Outer, kindname.class, MethodReference37.Outer.Inner, (compiler.misc.arg.length.mismatch)))
5 4 errors