Wed, 14 May 2014 15:41:28 -0600
8034223: Most-specific should not have any special treatment for boxed vs. unboxed types
Summary: Rewrite most-specific logic to conform to JLS 8 15.12.2.5
Reviewed-by: vromero
1 MethodReference20.java:21:26: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.invalid.mref: kindname.constructor, (compiler.misc.cant.apply.symbol: kindname.constructor, MethodReference20, java.lang.String, java.lang.Integer, kindname.class, MethodReference20<X>, (compiler.misc.no.conforming.assignment.exists: (compiler.misc.inconvertible.types: java.lang.Integer, java.lang.String))))
2 MethodReference20.java:22:9: compiler.err.cant.apply.symbol: kindname.method, test, MethodReference20.SAM<java.lang.Integer>, @549, kindname.class, MethodReference20<X>, (compiler.misc.no.conforming.assignment.exists: (compiler.misc.invalid.mref: kindname.constructor, (compiler.misc.cant.apply.symbol: kindname.constructor, MethodReference20, java.lang.String, java.lang.Integer, kindname.class, MethodReference20<X>, (compiler.misc.no.conforming.assignment.exists: (compiler.misc.inconvertible.types: java.lang.Integer, java.lang.String)))))
3 2 errors