Wed, 14 May 2014 15:41:28 -0600
8034223: Most-specific should not have any special treatment for boxed vs. unboxed types
Summary: Rewrite most-specific logic to conform to JLS 8 15.12.2.5
Reviewed-by: vromero
1 LambdaExpr10.java:18:28: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.not.a.functional.intf: java.lang.Object)
2 LambdaExpr10.java:19:32: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.not.a.functional.intf: java.lang.Object)
3 LambdaExpr10.java:23:40: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.not.a.functional.intf: java.lang.Object)
4 LambdaExpr10.java:24:46: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.not.a.functional.intf: java.lang.Object)
5 LambdaExpr10.java:28:29: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.not.a.functional.intf: java.lang.Object)
6 LambdaExpr10.java:29:33: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.not.a.functional.intf: java.lang.Object)
7 LambdaExpr10.java:33:35: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.incompatible.ret.type.in.lambda: (compiler.misc.inconvertible.types: java.lang.Object, void))
8 LambdaExpr10.java:34:49: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.incompatible.ret.type.in.lambda: (compiler.misc.inconvertible.types: java.lang.Object, void))
9 8 errors