test/com/sun/javadoc/testBaseClass/BaseClass.java

Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:54:52 -0800

author
ohair
date
Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:54:52 -0800
changeset 798
4868a36f6fd8
parent 554
9d9f26857129
child 2525
2eb010b6cb22
permissions
-rw-r--r--

6962318: Update copyright year
Reviewed-by: xdono

     1 /*
     2  * Copyright (c) 1999, 2002, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
     3  * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
     4  *
     5  * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
     6  * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
     7  * published by the Free Software Foundation.
     8  *
     9  * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
    10  * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
    11  * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
    12  * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
    13  * accompanied this code).
    14  *
    15  * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
    16  * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
    17  * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
    18  *
    19  * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
    20  * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
    21  * questions.
    22  */
    24 /**
    25  * Regression test for:
    26  * Javadoc does not process base class. If user specifies few classes on the
    27  * command line and few packages, with a situation where one of the specified
    28  * classes(on the command line) extends a class from one of the packages, then
    29  * due to some anomaly in ordering in which all the class and package objects
    30  * get constructed, few classes were getting marked as "not included", even
    31  * thought they were included in this run and hence documentation for those
    32  * packages was wrong. The test case for which javadoc was failing is given
    33  * in bug# 4197513.
    34  *
    35  * @bug 4197513
    36  * @summary Javadoc does not process base class.
    37  * @build BaseClass.java
    38  * @run shell BaseClassWrapper.sh
    39  * @author Atul M Dambalkar
    40  */
    42 import com.sun.javadoc.*;
    44 public class BaseClass {
    46   public static boolean start(RootDoc root) throws Exception {
    47      if (!root.classNamed("baz.Foo").isIncluded()) {
    48          throw new Exception("Base class is not included: baz.Foo");
    49      }
    50      return true;
    51   }
    53 }

mercurial