Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:31:02 +0100
6967002: JDK7 b99 javac compilation error (java.lang.AssertionError)
Summary: bug in JavacParser related to parsing of type annotations in varargs position
Reviewed-by: jjg
Contributed-by: mahmood@notnoop.com
duke@1 | 1 | /* |
ohair@554 | 2 | * Copyright (c) 1999, 2002, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
duke@1 | 3 | * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. |
duke@1 | 4 | * |
duke@1 | 5 | * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it |
duke@1 | 6 | * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as |
duke@1 | 7 | * published by the Free Software Foundation. |
duke@1 | 8 | * |
duke@1 | 9 | * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT |
duke@1 | 10 | * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or |
duke@1 | 11 | * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License |
duke@1 | 12 | * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that |
duke@1 | 13 | * accompanied this code). |
duke@1 | 14 | * |
duke@1 | 15 | * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version |
duke@1 | 16 | * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, |
duke@1 | 17 | * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. |
duke@1 | 18 | * |
ohair@554 | 19 | * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA |
ohair@554 | 20 | * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any |
ohair@554 | 21 | * questions. |
duke@1 | 22 | */ |
duke@1 | 23 | |
duke@1 | 24 | /** |
duke@1 | 25 | * Regression test for: |
duke@1 | 26 | * Javadoc does not process base class. If user specifies few classes on the |
duke@1 | 27 | * command line and few packages, with a situation where one of the specified |
duke@1 | 28 | * classes(on the command line) extends a class from one of the packages, then |
duke@1 | 29 | * due to some anomaly in ordering in which all the class and package objects |
duke@1 | 30 | * get constructed, few classes were getting marked as "not included", even |
duke@1 | 31 | * thought they were included in this run and hence documentation for those |
duke@1 | 32 | * packages was wrong. The test case for which javadoc was failing is given |
duke@1 | 33 | * in bug# 4197513. |
duke@1 | 34 | * |
duke@1 | 35 | * @bug 4197513 |
duke@1 | 36 | * @summary Javadoc does not process base class. |
duke@1 | 37 | * @build BaseClass.java |
duke@1 | 38 | * @run shell BaseClassWrapper.sh |
duke@1 | 39 | * @author Atul M Dambalkar |
duke@1 | 40 | */ |
duke@1 | 41 | |
duke@1 | 42 | import com.sun.javadoc.*; |
duke@1 | 43 | |
duke@1 | 44 | public class BaseClass { |
duke@1 | 45 | |
duke@1 | 46 | public static boolean start(RootDoc root) throws Exception { |
duke@1 | 47 | if (!root.classNamed("baz.Foo").isIncluded()) { |
duke@1 | 48 | throw new Exception("Base class is not included: baz.Foo"); |
duke@1 | 49 | } |
duke@1 | 50 | return true; |
duke@1 | 51 | } |
duke@1 | 52 | |
duke@1 | 53 | } |