Wed, 14 May 2014 15:41:28 -0600
8034223: Most-specific should not have any special treatment for boxed vs. unboxed types
Summary: Rewrite most-specific logic to conform to JLS 8 15.12.2.5
Reviewed-by: vromero
aoqi@0 | 1 | MethodRef_neg.java:30:15: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.invalid.mref: kindname.method, (compiler.misc.cant.apply.symbol: kindname.method, bar, int, java.lang.String, kindname.class, MethodRef_neg, (compiler.misc.no.conforming.assignment.exists: (compiler.misc.inconvertible.types: java.lang.String, int)))) |
aoqi@0 | 2 | MethodRef_neg.java:32:15: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.incompatible.ret.type.in.mref: (compiler.misc.inconvertible.types: int, java.lang.String)) |
aoqi@0 | 3 | MethodRef_neg.java:33:13: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.invalid.mref: kindname.method, (compiler.misc.cant.apply.symbol: kindname.method, make, compiler.misc.no.args, java.lang.Integer, kindname.class, MethodRef_neg, (compiler.misc.arg.length.mismatch))) |
aoqi@0 | 4 | MethodRef_neg.java:34:13: compiler.err.prob.found.req: (compiler.misc.incompatible.ret.type.in.mref: (compiler.misc.inconvertible.types: void, java.lang.Integer)) |
aoqi@0 | 5 | 4 errors |