Wed, 14 May 2014 15:41:28 -0600
8034223: Most-specific should not have any special treatment for boxed vs. unboxed types
Summary: Rewrite most-specific logic to conform to JLS 8 15.12.2.5
Reviewed-by: vromero
mcimadamore@1415 | 1 | /* |
mcimadamore@1415 | 2 | * @test /nodynamiccopyright/ |
vromero@2000 | 3 | * @bug 8003280 8016177 |
mcimadamore@1415 | 4 | * @summary Add lambda tests |
mcimadamore@1415 | 5 | * check that wildcards in the target method of a lambda conversion is handled correctly |
mcimadamore@1415 | 6 | * @author Maurizio Cimadamore |
vromero@2000 | 7 | * @compile TargetType10.java |
mcimadamore@1415 | 8 | */ |
mcimadamore@1415 | 9 | |
mcimadamore@1415 | 10 | class TargetType10 { |
mcimadamore@1415 | 11 | interface Function<A,R> { |
mcimadamore@1415 | 12 | R apply(A a); |
mcimadamore@1415 | 13 | } |
mcimadamore@1415 | 14 | |
mcimadamore@1415 | 15 | static class Test { |
mcimadamore@1415 | 16 | <A,B,C> Function<A,C> compose(Function<B,C> g, Function<A,? extends B> f) { return null; } |
mcimadamore@1415 | 17 | { compose(x -> "a" + x, x -> x + "b"); } |
mcimadamore@1415 | 18 | } |
mcimadamore@1415 | 19 | } |