Wed, 14 May 2014 15:41:28 -0600
8034223: Most-specific should not have any special treatment for boxed vs. unboxed types
Summary: Rewrite most-specific logic to conform to JLS 8 15.12.2.5
Reviewed-by: vromero
vromero@2391 | 1 | MethodReference42.java:38:11: compiler.err.cant.apply.symbol: kindname.method, m1, MethodReference42.SAM1, @811, kindname.class, MethodReference42, (compiler.misc.no.conforming.assignment.exists: (compiler.misc.incompatible.ret.type.in.lambda: (compiler.misc.incompatible.eq.upper.bounds: X, java.lang.String, java.lang.Number))) |
vromero@2391 | 2 | MethodReference42.java:40:11: compiler.err.cant.apply.symbol: kindname.method, m3, MethodReference42.SAM3, @855, kindname.class, MethodReference42, (compiler.misc.no.conforming.assignment.exists: (compiler.misc.incompatible.ret.type.in.lambda: (compiler.misc.incompatible.eq.upper.bounds: X, java.lang.Object, java.lang.Number))) |
vromero@2015 | 3 | MethodReference42.java:41:9: compiler.err.ref.ambiguous: m4, kindname.method, m4(MethodReference42.SAM2), MethodReference42, kindname.method, m4(MethodReference42.SAM3), MethodReference42 |
vromero@2000 | 4 | 3 errors |