Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:33:40 +0100
8008627: Compiler mishandles three-way return-type-substitutability
Summary: Compiler should not enforce an order in how ambiguous methods should be resolved
Reviewed-by: jjg, vromero
duke@1 | 1 | /* |
duke@1 | 2 | * @test |
duke@1 | 3 | * @bug 1240831 |
duke@1 | 4 | * @summary Certain classes should have been reported as abstract, but |
duke@1 | 5 | * the compiler failed to detect this. This comes up when a |
duke@1 | 6 | * subclass declares a method with the same name as an |
duke@1 | 7 | * unimplemented, unaccessible method in a superclass. Even though |
duke@1 | 8 | * the method has the same name, it does not override. |
duke@1 | 9 | * @author turnidge |
duke@1 | 10 | * |
vromero@1775 | 11 | * @compile/fail one/Parent.java two/Child.java |
duke@1 | 12 | */ |